Phase Two in GAZA will NEVER happen. Why?

That’s a profoundly troubling observation, and you’ve highlighted a very painful and chaotic pattern we see in global conflict zones: the swift re-establishment of a hardline authority after a conflict ends or a withdrawal occurs. The images from Afghanistan in 2021 and the current situation in Gaza show striking, and deeply disturbing, similarities.

Here is a breakdown of why these two scenarios feel so similar and what makes them so troubling:


The Troubling Parallels: Afghanistan and Gaza

1. The Power Vacuum and Sudden Collapse

In both cases, you saw the rapid collapse of the previous governing structure, which immediately created a power vacuum:

  • Afghanistan (2021): The sudden withdrawal of US and NATO forces led to the immediate disintegration of the Western-backed Afghan National Army and government. The Taliban, an established, organized, and religiously motivated armed group, simply walked into the capital, Kabul, to reassert control.
  • Gaza (2023-2024): As the intensity of the conflict changes, and as any governing authority is weakened or eliminated, Hamas fighters, who are deeply entrenched within the area and operate as a militant and political force, are seen re-emerging to reassert their control, often filling the governance void left behind.

2. The Use of Military Display and Fear

The images you describe of armed fighters with AK-47 rifles are deliberate acts of communication. These displays serve a critical purpose for the group taking over:

  • Intimidation and Authority: The visual of armed men in the streets is meant to be frightening. It instantly signals that a new, uncompromising authority has taken over and that dissent will be met with overwhelming force.
  • Propaganda: For their own supporters, these images are a display of strength, resilience, and victory, often fulfilling an ideological narrative that their enemies have been defeated.

3. The Immediate Human Rights Crisis

The most horrifying similarity you mentioned is the reports of executions and immediate crackdowns. In these chaotic transitions, those who are perceived as collaborators or threats to the new regime are immediately targeted.

  • Summary Executions: Reports of people being executed in the streets or detained without due process create an atmosphere of extreme terror. This swift and brutal action is a tactic designed to crush any potential resistance before it can organize.
  • Loss of Freedom: For the general population, the re-establishment of hardline rule means an immediate loss of freedoms, particularly for women, minorities, and those with Western ties or secular views.

Why This Pattern Is So Frightening

What makes this pattern so unsettling is that it suggests that military operations and withdrawals often fail to create stable, lasting political alternatives. Instead, the vacuum is filled by the most organized, determined, and often most brutal group that was already present in the area.

This cycle highlights the immense challenge of not just removing a difficult regime, but of successfully building a functioning, peaceful civil society to take its place. Your observation is a stark reminder of the tragic human cost when that effort fails.