Human Slaves ready for you to RENT or BUY. Do they want to see Human Trafficking out of the shadows? Where even more money could be made?

But Slave Rental and Slave Purchase would not be Limited to just one Skin Color. Sure, Pro-White is the Priority in White Nationalism. But Slaves be Slaves. And the more Ignorant, the less your Slave would want.

“Hello young man, you look like a perfect young candidate for membership into the New White Republican Nationalism Movement. Here, you can RENT or BUY yourself a SLAVE. Yes, Own a Person. All White People are God’s Chosen People. And with Our Rented Slaves, you can become the Best You. And we got all Ages.

SLAVES FOR:

COOKING.
HOUSE CLEANING.
BABYSITTING.
DISHWASHERS.
CAR WASHERS.
TRUCK DRIVERS.

But what if the List were Endless? Even long get.sex slaves?

You name it, we got the Perfect Slave for you!”

And if this trend is not countered by Independents and Democrats, the GOP will APPROVE INDENTURED SERVITUDE once again here in America. That could be the Open Door for Illegals?

I understand your intent is to convey the profound wrong of slavery and its horrors, and you’re looking for an image that can powerfully communicate that message. Your concept of a “Slave Rental Lot” with individuals chained and “rented” is a very strong and clear metaphor for the dehumanization and restriction of freedom that slavery embodied.

I can certainly help you create an image based on that concept, focusing on the metaphorical “rental lot” aspect to emphasize the inherent wrongness of treating human beings as property.

Here’s an image that aims to capture the essence of your “Slave Rental Lot” concept, focusing on the dehumanizing aspect of individuals treated as commodities in a modern setting. It depicts figures in a sterile, impersonal “rental lot” setting, subtly suggesting their immobility and transactional existence without being overtly graphic. Each person is chained to the Ground.

Is this the Future for America?

That is a very powerful and necessary question. The article you provided is a window into a dark corner of the political landscape, and your demand to “go deep” and “find the hidden truths” about this resurgence of pro-slavery sentiment is warranted.

Here is a deep dive into the underlying forces, historical echoes, and political strategy behind the “BS” you are seeing on a Slavery Revival Rhetoric.

1. The Hidden Truth: Slavery as a Proxy for White Supremacy

The core of this modern pro-slavery sentiment is not a serious, practical policy proposal for restoring the 19th-century economic institution of chattel slavery. It is a political and philosophical proxy for something much broader:

A. The Attack on Enlightenment and Equality

The deepest layer is a rejection of the fundamental American and Enlightenment ideals of equality and natural rights. When figures like Joshua Haymes argue that “the institution of slavery is not inherently evil” or Joel Webbon claims Black people owe their historical existence to white colonialism, they are trying to:

Undermine the Moral Foundation of American Progress: By defending slavery, they implicitly attack the moral basis of Emancipation, the Civil Rights Movement, and any modern push for racial justice. They are trying to re-legitimize the idea that some groups are inherently superior and that social hierarchy is natural and good.
Establish a Divine Mandate for Hierarchy: Using a twisted interpretation of Christianity, some of these figures try to claim a Biblical defense of slavery.¹ This is a direct echo of the antebellum Southern argument that slavery was a “positive good” and a “divine institution” necessary for social order.² By doing this, they seek to place their political views beyond rational debate, making them an unquestionable matter of religious truth.

B. The “Racial Threat” and Political Resentment

Sociological and historical research clearly shows that political conservatism and anti-Black sentiment are still most pronounced in areas of the South that had high concentrations of enslaved people in 1860.³

This current rhetoric taps into a long-standing, learned resentment rooted in the historical loss of power that white Southerners experienced after the Civil War and the subsequent Civil Rights era.
The “Black Belt” legacy suggests that for many, the push to “Make America Great Again” is fundamentally a desire to return to a time when racial and social hierarchies were undisputed and legally enforced. Defending slavery is the ultimate, most inflammatory way to signal this intent.

2. Who’s Behind This BS? The Political Strategy

You asked, “Who’s behind this BS?” While the individuals named (Haymes, Webbon, Giunta, Hoyt) are the ones speaking it, the hidden truth is that this rhetoric serves a clear function for the broader political movement they align with.

A. The Extreme “Mudsill” Theory

The concept of compelled slave labor mentioned by the streamer Zack Hoyt is a modern revival of the Mudsill Theory used to defend slavery in the 1850s.

Original Theory: Pro-slavery advocates like James Henry Hammond argued that all great societies require a “mudsill”—a permanent, poor, and powerless class (the enslaved) to perform menial labor so that the higher class of white citizens could be free to lead and advance civilization.⁴
Modern Echo: Hoyt’s idea of using immigrants for “compelled slave labor” and the overall defense of a permanent underclass fits this classic authoritarian formula. It normalizes the idea of dehumanization and forced labor as a necessary societal foundation.

B. The “Troll-to-Policy” Pipeline

The figures cited are often considered “influencers” and are part of the outer extremes of the movement. Their role is to:

Test the Boundaries: They introduce the most shocking, taboo ideas (like defending slavery) into public discourse.
Desensitize the Base: By getting an audience used to hearing this extreme language, it makes slightly less extreme, but still racist or authoritarian, ideas seem reasonable by comparison.
Provide a Shield: The mainstream politicians in the movement can publicly disavow the extremist (like dismissing an operative like Giunta), while still benefiting from the extremist ideas having pulled the Overton Window (the range of acceptable ideas in public discourse) sharply to the right.

In short, the “BS” is a strategic escalation of white nationalist rhetoric. It leverages historical grievance and a desire for an autocratic social order to solidify the base and push the entire political conversation toward anti-democratic, hierarchical, and explicitly racist principles.

Here is a deep dive into the underlying forces, historical echoes, and political strategy behind the “BS” you are seeing.

1. The Hidden Truth: Slavery as a Proxy for White Supremacy

A. The Attack on Enlightenment and Equality

Undermine the Moral Foundation of American Progress: By defending slavery, they implicitly attack the moral basis of Emancipation, the Civil Rights Movement, and any modern push for racial justice. They are trying to re-legitimize the idea that some groups are inherently superior and that social hierarchy is natural and good.
Establish a Divine Mandate for Hierarchy: Using a twisted interpretation of Christianity, some of these figures try to claim a Biblical defense of slavery.¹ This is a direct echo of the antebellum Southern argument that slavery was a “positive good” and a “divine institution” necessary for social order.² By doing this, they seek to place their political views beyond rational debate, making them an unquestionable matter of religious truth.

B. The “Racial Threat” and Political Resentment

This current rhetoric taps into a long-standing, learned resentment rooted in the historical loss of power that white Southerners experienced after the Civil War and the subsequent Civil Rights era.
The “Black Belt” legacy suggests that for many, the push to “Make America Great Again” is fundamentally a desire to return to a time when racial and social hierarchies were undisputed and legally enforced. Defending slavery is the ultimate, most inflammatory way to signal this intent.

2. Who’s Behind This BS? The Political Strategy

These far-right influencers are all-in on chattel slavery

MAGA influencers and a GOP operative have been offering defenses and outright endorsements of slavery in recent weeks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.msnbc.com/msnbc/amp/shows/top-stories/blog/rcna238690

A. The Extreme “Mudsill” Theory

The concept of compelled slave labor mentioned by the streamer Zack Hoyt is a modern revival of the Mudsill Theory used to defend slavery in the 1850s.

Original Theory: Pro-slavery advocates like James Henry Hammond argued that all great societies require a “mudsill”—a permanent, poor, and powerless class (the enslaved) to perform menial labor so that the higher class of white citizens could be free to lead and advance civilization.⁴
Modern Echo: Hoyt’s idea of using immigrants for “compelled slave labor” and the overall defense of a permanent underclass fits this classic authoritarian formula. It normalizes the idea of dehumanization and forced labor as a necessary societal foundation.

B. The “Troll-to-Policy” Pipeline

The figures cited are often considered “influencers” and are part of the outer extremes of the movement. Their role is to:

Test the Boundaries: They introduce the most shocking, taboo ideas (like defending slavery) into public discourse.
Desensitize the Base: By getting an audience used to hearing this extreme language, it makes slightly less extreme, but still racist or authoritarian, ideas seem reasonable by comparison.
Provide a Shield: The mainstream politicians in the movement can publicly disavow the extremist (like dismissing an operative like Giunta), while still benefiting from the extremist ideas having pulled the Overton Window (the range of acceptable ideas in public discourse) sharply to the right.

To reignite Slavery, one must Destroy all Negative Things about it-https://www.msnbc.com/top-stories/latest/trump-slavery-history-national-parks-harpers-ferry-smithsonian-rcna231701

One must also remove any Negative Views about Slavery from Books. Ban them, rewrite them or Destroy them.

https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/floridas-new-history-standard-blow-our-students-and-nation

Key Takeaways

Florida’s new standards for how African American history should be taught have drawn severe criticism across the country, especially in The Sunshine State.
These new standards require middle school students to be taught that the experience of slavery was beneficial to African Americans because it helped them acquire skills—a setback for students.

PROJECT 2025 has a Plan. And it is for White Nationalism.

That is an extremely important question, especially in light of the resurgence of pro-slavery rhetoric we just discussed. Your ability to connect these two themes is insightful, as they both touch on the core issue of human equality and the integrity of American history.

Here is a detailed breakdown of Project 2025 and how its proposals intersect with issues of historical revisionism and the legacy of slavery.

What is Project 2025?

Project 2025 (officially, The Presidential Transition Project) is a comprehensive initiative led by the conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation, in collaboration with over 100 conservative organizations.¹

Goal: To prepare a detailed blueprint for the next conservative U.S. presidential administration, allowing it to rapidly implement a sweeping agenda “on Day One.”²
Blueprint: Its core document, “Mandate for Leadership,” is a massive, nearly 1,000-page policy manual outlining specific changes for virtually every part of the federal government.³
Personnel: It includes a massive database to vet and train thousands of politically and ideologically aligned candidates to replace career civil servants in key executive branch positions.⁴

Core Deciphered Themes and Proposals

Project 2025 proposes radical changes across the entire federal government, aimed at dismantling what its authors call “the administrative state” and consolidating executive power.⁵

Area of Policy	Project 2025 Proposal	The Deciphered Intent
Executive Power	Reinstating “Schedule F” to strip civil service protections from tens of thousands of federal employees, replacing them with politically loyal appointees.	Centralize absolute power under the President, removing non-partisan checks and balances within the bureaucracy (FBI, DOJ, CDC, etc.).
Education	Abolish the Department of Education and shift power/funding control to the states.	Eliminate federal oversight of public school curricula, enabling states to remove topics deemed “woke propaganda,” such as Critical Race Theory and aspects of gender identity.
Historical & Culture	“Deleting” terms like “diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)” and “gender equity” from every federal rule, regulation, contract, and piece of legislation.	De-legitimize and erase federal focus on racial, gender, and social justice issues; assert a singular, traditional view of American identity and history.
Social Policy	Enforce the 1873 Comstock Act to ban the mailing of all abortion-related drugs and materials, and promote a national ban on pornography.	Enact laws favored by the Christian Right to restrict reproductive rights and define morality at the federal level, often starting from the moment of conception.
Immigration	Mass deportations of undocumented immigrants and deploying the U.S. military for domestic law enforcement on the border.	Militarize immigration policy and target specific communities for removal.
Economy/Labor	Propose a shift to a two-rate individual tax system (15% and 30%), advocate for the reduction of the corporate tax rate, and make it harder for unions to organize.	Favor corporate interests and diminish labor protections.

Does Project 2025 Propose Slavery?

No, Project 2025 does not explicitly propose a return to chattel slavery. The 900+ page document does not include a policy recommendation to reinstate slavery as an economic or legal institution.

BUT… It Enables Historical Revisionism

The threat you see is not a direct proposal for slavery, but an explicit goal of rewriting the past and dismantling mechanisms for achieving racial and social equality. This is where the themes connect:

Targeting Civil Rights & History: The explicit call to abolish the teaching of “critical race theory” (CRT) and to remove DEI programs is aimed at curtailing education about the systemic and enduring impact of slavery and racism in America.⁶
The “Anti-White” Frame: The project advocates for having the Department of Justice prosecute what it terms “anti-white racism.”⁷ This flips the narrative, reframing policies meant to address historical and systemic disadvantages as discrimination against the majority group.⁸ This is the political logic that justifies the pro-slavery rhetoric you saw—by claiming victimhood, they attempt to invalidate any conversation about historical injustice.
The Ideological Roots: As discussed, the extreme pro-slavery arguments (like those from Haymes and Webbon) and the Project 2025 blueprint come from the same broader ideological sphere that rejects egalitarianism. The Project 2025 plan provides the political and governmental infrastructure (dismantling agencies, vetting personnel) that would be needed to enforce an agenda based on this anti-equality worldview.⁹

In essence, Project 2025 is seen by critics as a way to codify historical denial and anti-equality values into the structure of the federal government, thereby removing the systems that have been put in place over the last 60 years to grapple with the legacy of slavery and ensure equal rights.

In October 2025, far-right commentator Joshua Haymes claimed that the fall of the pro-slavery Confederacy was a long-term detriment to the nation. In a podcast hosted with Pastor Brooks Potteiger of Pilgrim Hill Reformed Fellowship, he also argued that “slavery is not inherently evil”.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is a member of Pilgrim Hill Reformed Fellowship. As of October 2025, it is unknown whether Hegseth has publicly commented on Haymes’s recent remarks.

Who is Joshua Haymes?

Far-right commentator: Haymes has been identified as a Christian nationalist commentator and uses a podcast to advocate for his theological positions.
Former pastoral intern: He was formerly a pastoral intern at Pilgrim Hill Reformed Fellowship but clarified in August 2025 that he is no longer employed by the church and is now a full-time media and content creator.
Controversial online statements: Haymes has also made a number of other inflammatory statements online:
- Claiming that liberalism is a greater threat to the U.S. than neo-Nazism.
- Advocating for capital punishment for adultery and abortion.
- Seemingly calling for the drowning of LGBTQ+ Pride marchers.

Who is Pete Hegseth?

Current Secretary of War: Pete Hegseth was confirmed as the 29th Secretary of Defense in January 2025 and assumed office the following day. The department was renamed the Department of War in September 2025.
Member of Pilgrim Hill Reformed Fellowship: Hegseth is a member of the same church where Haymes was formerly a pastoral intern.
Former Fox News host: Prior to his current role, Hegseth was a conservative television personality and co-hosted Fox & Friends Weekend from 2017 to 2024.
Controversial past: Throughout his career, Hegseth has faced criticism for various actions and statements:
- He encouraged Donald Trump to pardon U.S. servicemen accused or convicted of war crimes in 2019.
- He was removed from security detail for the 2021 presidential inauguration due to concerns over his tattoos and prior association with “extremist views online”.
- In 2025, he faced allegations of sexual misconduct and alcohol issues.
- He was also involved in a controversy regarding the leak of classified information from a government group chat.