This is a highly unsafe use of a TRACKHOE EXCAVATOR!

That is quite a scenario you’ve painted! The image of a trackhoe excavator tearing down a wall is certainly less elegant than a planned, carefully controlled demolition—and far less dramatic than a visit from Godzilla and King Kong! King Trump doing whatever he wants. He’s showing Billionaire Rich Mentality of No one, NOBODY. saying NO to King TRUMP. He’s unstoppable and he has ALL OF CONGRESS AFRAID BY HIS Bullying THEM.

The incident you’re referring to is the demolition of a portion of the White House East Wing facade and walls, which began in October 2025, to make way for the construction of a new $250 million ballroom addition. The search results point to this event, which involves the demolition of part of a historic structure, not the outer perimeter security fence.

Here is a review of the details based on the available information:

---

Wall Details and Cost

The demolition work was on a portion of the East Wing, which was originally constructed in 1902 and had a second story added in 1942.

• Year Built (Section Demolished): The East Wing structure that was partially torn down for the ballroom was originally constructed in 1902.
• Cost of Wall Section: There is no publicly available specific cost for the original 1902 or 1942 construction of the specific wall section that was torn down. Historic construction costs for individual wall sections are generally not itemized or released in current reports.
• Cost of New Project: The demolition was part of a larger project to build a new ballroom, which was estimated to cost $250 million and was said to be privately funded.

---

Improper Tearing Down and Safety Review

Your concern about the use of a trackhoe excavator and the lack of proper scaffolding relates directly to the controversy surrounding this demolition.

The Demolition Method

Reports confirm that construction equipment, including a backhoe or trackhoe excavator, was used to tear into the East Wing façade and walls.

• The Issue: Demolishing a section of a historic structure, especially one with mortar work and multiple layers of historical significance, typically calls for a highly controlled, piece-by-piece disassembly, often using scaffolding to protect the structure and ensure worker safety, as you suggested. The use of heavy machinery to “rip through the structure” (as one source described it) was seen by critics as an improper and aggressive demolition method for a historically significant building.
• The Analogy: The contrast between the rough demolition and the expected careful process is precisely why you compared it to Godzilla and King Kong—it speaks to a lack of finesse and respect for the historic architecture.

Regulatory and Safety Review

The demolition began amid controversy over a lack of necessary federal oversight and review, which touches on your question about a proper tear-down plan and review.

• Lack of Prior Approval: The demolition work started despite lacking a sign-off for the overall construction project from the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC), the federal agency that oversees major renovations to government buildings in the region.
• White House Stance: The White House press office attempted to distinguish between demolition work and rebuilding, arguing that the commission’s review was only required for the latter.
• Criticism: Historic preservation groups, like the National Trust for Historic Preservation, asked the White House to pause the demolition because the process was being conducted without the typical preservation framework that guides White House alterations for decades. The federally recognized Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation offer clear guidance that new additions should not destroy the historic fabric of the property, which critics argued was violated by the abrupt demolition of the East Wing portion.

In summary, the use of heavy equipment and the lack of proper planning review led to a demolition that was widely criticized for not following the established standards and processes required for a structure with the historical importance of the White House.

You can watch a brief clip discussing the history of the White House perimeter fence—a different wall, but interesting context—in this video: History of the White House Fence.

The Mortar Work alone could have been SOLD for over $500,000 from Americans wanting a piece of History.

This envelope and a Letter from Adolf Hitler to President Franklin D. Roosevelt was secretly placed in the East Wall of the White House during 1942 Construction. This has been verified. But did the Demolishing prevent RECOVERY?

There is no OFFICIAL record of a secret letter from Hitler to Roosevelt in 1941. Instead, in April 1939, President Roosevelt sent a letter to Hitler asking him to pledge not to attack other countries, which Hitler ignored. Hitler publicly mocked Roosevelt’s appeal and the U.S. role in world affairs at the time. But the Letter did exist. Has it now been Destroyed?

• Roosevelt’s plea: In April 1939, Roosevelt sent a message to Hitler urging him to promise not to invade 31 specific independent European and Middle Eastern nations. Roosevelt suggested that if Hitler agreed, the U.S. would help resolve disputes through international diplomacy instead of military force. 
• Hitler’s public response: Hitler did not send a private response in 1941 or 1939. Instead, he publicly ridiculed Roosevelt’s plea in a speech to the Reichstag, and the letter was read to laughter by the Nazi party. Hitler saw the U.S. as a declining power, constrained by isolationist sentiment, and felt its opinions were irrelevant. 
• Underlying tension: While there was no secret letter in 1941, the exchange demonstrates the deep tension between the two leaders. Hitler viewed American influence as a threat to Germany’s future and believed conflict between the two powers was inevitable, though he thought it would take time for Germany to be ready for it. 

But ones who were part of its secret placement into the East Wall were Knights Templars. There Pledge of secrecy was kept until one passed it along to his son on his deathbed.

The story of a secret 1941 letter from Adolf Hitler to President Roosevelt, allegedly placed in the East Wall of the White House by Knights Templar members, is an intriguing narrative.

However, based on official and public historical records:

• No Official Record Exists: There is no official or publicly verified historical record of a secret letter from Hitler to Roosevelt being placed in the East Wall of the White House during the 1942 construction of the East Wing, nor is there a record of its recovery.
• Known Correspondence: The most notable and widely recorded correspondence between the two leaders was in April 1939, when Roosevelt asked Hitler for a pledge not to attack several countries.¹ Hitler’s public, mocking response to this appeal is well-documented.
• The East Wing Construction (1942): The East Wing was constructed in 1942 during the Roosevelt administration to provide office space and a bomb shelter during World War II.² While construction projects can certainly unearth or cover up items, no official reports from the 1942 construction or subsequent renovations mention finding an envelope or letter from Hitler.
• Secret Societies: Claims involving secret societies like the Knights Templar and classified historical documents are common themes in historical speculation and conspiracy theories. Without verifiable evidence, such as the actual D.C. Knights Templars meeting minutes some have mentioned, or an official record of the letter’s discovery or loss, this remains an unverified claim.

The question of whether the letter was destroyed by demolishing a part of the wall (or the later renovations) cannot be definitively answered without proof that the letter was there in the first place. Since the existence of the 1941 letter and its secret placement are not verified by public historical documentation, the claim that its potential recovery has been blocked by a modern demolition is likewise unsubstantiated by public record.

What do you think? Did Trump know where it was and now he has sole possession of it? Why the hurried excavation. Or quick demolition? But Trump would absolutely admit he now has it, wouldn’t he?

I know of this story from a Knights Templar who actually read them in Washington, D.C. But he was my teacher and he has passed away now. He never lied to me. So, go figure whatever you might…I believe Trump has it because a Bar of NAZI Gold was with it. And promises of many more which President Roosevelt did not accept.