There is a horrible Tragedy taking place! Demand they Get a WARRANT.
WHY?
Fruitcake Fake ICE AGENTS are Kidnapping and Raping unknowing Individuals in America. Only Legal Warrants will stop the Ability for a Fake Fruitcake ICE Agent to pretend such a RUSE to grab someone. Grab anyone. Grab your Wife. Grab your Daughter. Grab your Sister. Grab your Mother.
ICE Agents must get WARRANTS!
This must be what Happens because it is the Law of the Land. Framed into our U.S. Constitution. Just because Our Billionaire President breaks the Law or doesn’t follow the Constitution, Well, that still doesn’t give all Americans to do the same. He knows how to use Lawyers and Law Firms and knows how to Tie Up the Courts. But that costs Millions. And do you have Millions too?
This must be Fixed-
Why “Probable Cause” Must Apply to All: The Constitutional Necessity of Judicial Warrants for ICE
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution stands as a foundational pillar of American liberty, a direct repudiation of the “general warrants” and invasive practices of colonial rule. It enshrines a simple, profound principle: the right of the people “to be in their homes, persons, papers, and effects, secure against unreasonable searches and seizures,” shall not be violated. To breach the sanctity of the home, the state must first justify its intrusion to an impartial judge. Yet, this core protection is being systematically eroded by the tactics of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which routinely employs deceptive ruses and “administrative warrants” to subvert the very constitutional checks it is bound to observe. This practice is legally dubious, corrosive to public trust, and must be replaced by the unequivocal, non-negotiable standard that the Constitution demands: a judicial warrant.
The central flaw in ICE’s current operations lies in a deliberate conflation of two vastly different documents: an administrative warrant and a judicial warrant. A judicial warrant, the “real warrant” secured by the Fourth Amendment, can only be issued by a neutral magistrate or judge. It requires law enforcement to present evidence demonstrating “probable cause” that a crime has been committed and that the person or evidence sought is at the specific location to be searched. This is the great check of the American legal system, a moment where the judicial branch intercedes to protect citizens from executive overreach.
An administrative warrant, by contrast, is a legal fiction in this context. Forms like the I-200 (Warrant for Arrest of Alien) or I-205 (Warrant of Removal) are not signed by a judge. They are issued internally by ICE itself, an agency of the executive branch. This is the executive branch giving itself permission to execute an action, entirely bypassing the impartial review of the judiciary. ICE’s own internal handbooks, as revealed by Freedom of Information Act lawsuits, explicitly concede that these administrative warrants do not authorize entry into a home. They function as internal paperwork, not as constitutional keys to a person’s front door.
This legal deficiency is the very reason the “secret cloak and dagger dirty tricks” that the public has become aware of—the “ruse”—are now official policy. Because agents lack the legal authority to force entry, they are trained to secure “consent” through deception. This includes tactics like impersonating local police (“We’re from the ‘POLICE,’ investigating a crime”), pretending to be probation officers, or even posing as potential employers.
This state-sanctioned deception is a logical and constitutional travesty for two primary reasons. First, consent obtained through lies is not true, voluntary consent. It is a manufactured waiver of rights. A person who opens their door to “Detective Chad” to help with a criminal investigation has not consented to an immigration arrest; they have been tricked into forfeiting their Fourth Amendment rights without their knowledge. This tactic transforms a constitutional protection into a game of “Gotcha!” where the government is rewarded for its duplicity.
Second, these ruses inflict catastrophic damage on public trust, endangering the entire ecosystem of public safety. When community members learn that the “POLICE” vest may be a lie, that the “detective” at the door may be an ICE agent, the inevitable result is that they will stop interacting with all law enforcement. This “chilling effect” is not theoretical. It means victims of domestic violence will not call for help. Witnesses to crimes will not come forward. Communities become less safe because the agency tasked with one form of enforcement has poisoned the well for all others. The trust required for local police to do their jobs is a finite resource, and ICE’s deceptive tactics are burning it to the ground.
The solution is not complicated; it is merely to follow the Constitution. The standard for a government agent to cross the threshold of a private home must be uniform, clear, and high. The nature of the alleged violation—whether criminal or civil—is irrelevant to the sanctity of the home itself. If the FBI, in pursuit of a suspected terrorist, must present probable cause to a judge, it is a logical absurdity to suggest that an ICE agent, in pursuit of an individual for a civil violation, should be held to a lesser standard.
Requiring ICE to obtain a judicial warrant for all home entries is not an obstacle to justice; it is justice. It would end the destructive use of ruses, as they would no longer be necessary. It would restore the constitutional check and balance between the executive and the judiciary. Most importantly, it would affirm that the protections of the Constitution are not a set of guidelines to be cleverly bypassed, but a sacred boundary that protects all people from the arbitrary power of the state. The front door of a home is the final line of defense for individual liberty; it must be secured by the full force of the law, not kicked in by a lie.
BUT ICE TEACHES it’s ICE AGENTS To USE Fake Fruitcake RUSES!
Yes, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents are trained to use “ruses,” or deceptive tactics, to gain entry into homes or obtain information. These ruses, which have been sanctioned by ICE policy, include agents pretending to be local police, wearing plain clothes, or using other false pretenses to trick people into opening doors or stepping outside without a judicial warrant.
- Purpose: The goal is to overcome the limitation that civil arrest warrants are administrative, not judicial, which generally prevents agents from entering a home without consent.
- Common tactics: Some examples of ruses include:
- Identifying themselves as “police” or “detectives” from a local precinct.
- Stating they are conducting a probation check or are part of the “warrant squad.”
- Claiming they are calling from the District Attorney’s office or a local court to verify information.
- Posing as a civilian seeking a contractor for a job.
- Legal context: While deception is permitted in some cases, the use of these ruses in civil immigration enforcement has been criticized as an unconstitutional violation of Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.
- Recent developments: Internal ICE training materials on ruses were made public after a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, and a recent settlement has prohibited the use of some deceptive tactics in home enforcement operations, requiring officers to wear visible “ICE” identifiers.
Must we train Our Own to be users of illegal, often Corrupt Tactics to grab someone they want to Kick Out of out Country? Demand they get a WARRANT.
ICE Ruses – Immigrant Defense Project
ICE agents are allowed and encouraged to use ruses. ICE agents use ruses to gain entry to homes without judicial warrants or to obtain information about the ind…
Immigrant Defense Project
ICE Ruses – Immigrant Defense Project – Facebook
Oct 13, 2025 — ICE agents have been known to lie about who they are or why they are at someone’s door. These lies are called “ruses.” They’re part of an officially…
It’s legal for an immigration agent to pretend to be a police officer outside someone’s door. But should it be? – Los Angeles Times
Feb 19, 2017 — However, agents generally are not armed with search or arrest warrants when they try to detain someone on suspicion of being in the country illegall…
Los Angeles Times
ICE admits in lawsuit it trains agents to identify themselves as ‘police,’ use ‘ruses’ to enter homes
Feb 11, 2023 — Federal immigration agents are not police officers. However, a judge has ruled that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has trained its a…
San Francisco Chronicle
Settlement Prohibits ICE Officers’ Use of Deceptive Tactics | ACLU of Southern California
Aug 3, 2025 — The settlement also requires that ICE officers: * Wear visible identifiers on their clothing prominently identifying them as “ICE” * Implement new tr…
ACLU of Southern California
This Deceptive ICE Tactic Violates the Fourth Amendment | ACLU
Apr 11, 2023 — Representing themselves as probation officers and claiming that they are conducting a probation check, or referencing a person’s probation status. T…
American Civil Liberties Union
Ways that ICE pretends to be local police – Immigrant Defense Project
* When Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents go to homes or in the community to arrest non-citizens, they often tell lies or “ruses” about who they are…
Immigrant Defense Project
ICE RUSES: FROM DECEPTION TO DEPORTATION – Columbia Law Review –
Jan 28, 2022 — In 2005, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency enacted a policy sanctioning its civil ICE agents to use strategic deception, known as…
Columbia Law Review –
Inherently Coercive Entry: ICE’s Use of Unconstitutional Ruses
For the past several years, there have been reports of non-citizens lied to and coerced into allowing ICE agents to enter their homes based on false pretenses…
Yes. ICE agents are taught that they are allowed to use ruses (with very few limits) and are trained on how to conduct a ruse. As part of …
The New York TimesNational Guard Use in Los Angeles in Doubt After Court Rulings
Gavin Newsom had tears in his eyes as he described to reporters encounters he has had with family members of those arrested by ICE agents.
Still Confused?
Yes, a ruse is a type of lie, specifically a clever trick or deception intended to mislead someone. While a lie is a false statement, a ruse is a broader plan or action that uses trickery, which may include lies, to achieve a goal.
What is an example of a ruse?
AI Overview-
A ruse is a trick or deception used to mislead someone, such as the classic Trojan Horse, where the Greeks used a giant wooden horse to hide soldiers inside and get past the walls of Troy. Other examples include using a fake excuse, like pretending to be a lost delivery person to get a foot in the door, or a distraction, such as the magician’s misdirection.
Are ICE AGENTS so lazy that they cannot take the time to legally Get a Legal WARRANT?
thelivingbreathingjamesbrown.com 
You must be logged in to post a comment.