Since when did Trump begin to read the minds of Dictators. And it’s obvious. Trump does Deals where’s there’s money in it for him personally. He started this Term with $2 Billion and will have over $300 Billion Dollars when he leaves Office. Or has no one been paying ATTENTION?

As of Friday, November 21, 2025, reports have emerged detailing a controversial 28-point peace plan proposed by the Trump administration.¹ This plan has been described by critics and analysts as heavily favoring Russian President Vladimir Putin’s interests, placing significant pressure on Ukraine to accept terms that align with Moscow’s key demands.²

Here is the breakdown of the situation based on the latest reports:

1. The “Support” for Putin (Alignment with Russian Demands)

While President Trump frames the deal as a “win-win,” the terms reported in the leaked draft align closely with objectives Putin has sought since the invasion began.³ This has led to widespread criticism that the plan supports Putin’s strategic goals:

• Territorial Concessions: The plan reportedly requires Ukraine to cede the Donbas region and Crimea to Russia.⁴ It would also freeze the conflict lines in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, effectively allowing Russia to keep captured territory.⁵
• No NATO Membership: A core demand of Putin’s, the plan would force Ukraine to amend its constitution to permanently rule out joining NATO.⁶
• Demilitarization: Ukraine would be required to significantly reduce its standing army (reports suggest a cap of 600,000 personnel), limiting its future defense capabilities.⁷
• Sanctions Relief: The plan proposes a pathway for lifting Western sanctions on Russia and even suggests inviting Russia back into the G8 (formerly the G7), ending its diplomatic isolation.⁸

2. Trump’s Pressure Campaign

President Trump is reportedly using US leverage to force this deal through quickly:

• Deadline: Trump has suggested a deadline of Thanksgiving (November 27, 2025) for Ukrainian President Zelensky to agree to the terms.9 A meal with No Turkey. (SMH)
• Threat of Aid Withdrawal: Reports indicate the administration has threatened to cut off essential US intelligence sharing and military aid if Kyiv refuses to sign.¹⁰What a BULLY!

3. Reactions

• Vladimir Putin: Russian officials have signaled they are ready to use this plan as a “foundation” for negotiations, though they may still push for even more specific concessions.¹¹ Putin has historically viewed such terms as the minimum acceptable outcome for Russia.
• Volodymyr Zelensky: The Ukrainian President has publicly stated that his country faces an “impossible choice” between losing its dignity (capitulation) or losing its most important ally (the US).12 He has warned that accepting these terms would be a disaster for Ukraine’s sovereignty but acknowledged the immense pressure of a potentially brutal winter without US support.

Summary

The “support” you are hearing about refers to the Trump administration presenting a peace framework that grants Russia land, military neutrality from Ukraine, and economic rehabilitation, while pressuring Ukraine to accept these losses under threat of abandonment.¹³

Next Step: Would you like me to dig deeper into the specific security guarantees the US is offering Ukraine in exchange for these concessions, or look up reaction from other European allies?

Yes, please do-

Based on the latest reports from November 2025, here is a detailed breakdown of the specific security guarantees the U.S. is offering Ukraine and the reaction from European allies.

1. Specific US Security Guarantees (The “Digging Deeper” Part)

The proposed security arrangement is part of a broader 28-point “peace plan” reportedly drafted by the Trump administration.¹ The guarantees are designed to replace Ukraine’s NATO membership bid, which the plan explicitly forces Ukraine to abandon.²

• “Article 5-Lite”: The text reportedly describes the assurance as being “modeled on the principles of Article 5” of the NATO treaty but “adapted to the circumstances.”³
• The Trigger: The guarantee is triggered by a “significant, deliberate, and sustained armed attack” by Russia across the agreed armistice line.⁴
• The Response Mechanism: Unlike NATO’s Article 5, which implies an automatic collective defense response, this guarantee is more procedural:
  • It requires “immediate consultations” between the U.S., Ukraine, and European partners.
  • The U.S. President would then “determine the measures necessary,” which “may include armed force,” but does not mandate it.
  • Other potential responses listed include intelligence support, logistical assistance, and economic sanctions.⁵
• “Decisive Military Response”: Despite the procedural language, the proposal reportedly promises a “decisive coordinated military response” to any future invasion, alongside the “reinstatement of all global sanctions” on Russia.⁶
• Specific Conditions & Clauses:
  • Invalidation Clause: The guarantee becomes void if Ukraine launches a missile at Moscow or St. Petersburg “without cause” or if Ukraine invades Russia.⁷
  • Compensation: In a highly unusual stipulation, reports indicate the U.S. would “receive compensation” for providing this security guarantee, effectively charging Ukraine for protection.
  • Foreign Troop Ban: The plan explicitly bans foreign troops from being stationed on Ukrainian soil.⁸ This effectively kills recent British and French proposals to deploy training troops or peacekeepers to Ukraine.
  • Duration: The framework would remain valid for 10 years and is renewable.⁹

2. Reaction from European Allies

The reaction from key European capitals has been characterized by shock, frustration, and scramble. The primary grievance is that major European powers were completely excluded from the drafting of a plan that dictates the future security architecture of their own continent.¹⁰

• “Nothing About Ukraine Without Ukraine”: This remains the official stance of the EU. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and other leaders have publicly insisted that no deal can be imposed on Kyiv.¹¹
• Lack of Consultation: Officials from France, Germany, Poland, and the UK have confirmed they were not consulted on the plan.¹² This is particularly stinging for the UK and France, who had been developing their own security coalition (“Coalition of the Willing”) that this U.S. plan would effectively outlaw.
• Fears of “Capitulation”: Several European diplomats have privately (and some publicly) described the plan as a “capitulation.”¹³ They argue that freezing the lines without robust, automatic guarantees just gives Russia time to rearm.
  • Poland has expressed deep concern, viewing a compromised Ukraine as a direct threat to its own borders.¹⁴
  • Germany has criticized the proposal as “not a real plan” but merely a “list of topics” that favors Russian demands.
• Upcoming Counter-Move: European leaders are reportedly scrambling to meet (scheduled for Saturday) to formulate a unified response or counter-proposal, fearing that if Ukraine is forced to sign this by the U.S. “Thanksgiving deadline,” European security interests will be permanently compromised.¹⁵

Summary: The U.S. offer essentially trades Ukraine’s land and NATO ambition for a strictly U.S.-mediated protection pact that Ukraine might have to pay for, while stripping Europe of the ability to deploy its own troops to shield its eastern flank.

It’s a SCREW YOU ZELENSKY JOB. I’M BACK TO LOVING PUTIN SO I GET PAID! I can see my TRUMP TOWER MOSCOW now!