If Russia Annexed Alaska, Trump’s Peace Plan would be to give Russia Alaska without firing a Shot.

And possibly one or two more States too like the ones closer to Alaska, but likely include California because He Hates Them.

If Russia Annexed any part of Your Country, Trump’s Peace Plan would be to give that Annexed Land to Russia and some more too.

You see Trump’s Idea of Peace Plans with Putin is to give Putin whatever he wants.

Just ask Ukraine what the latest one is. It’s a total Victory to Putin. But Biden would never have supported such a plan.

Let’s look more closely-

Gemini

Conversation with Gemini

If Putin annexed land in your Country. Trump, as his Peace Plan Negotiator would require that you give up the Annexed Land for the Peace Deal.

Based on the peace plan proposals reported in November 2025, the answer is yes. Donald Trump’s current strategy for ending the war involves requiring the nation that has been invaded (in this real-world case, Ukraine) to cede territory to the aggressor in exchange for a ceasefire.

If we apply the reported details of his “28-point peace plan” for Ukraine to your hypothetical scenario, here is what that deal looks like:

1. “Land for Peace” is the Core Requirement

Reports from November 2025 indicate that the Trump administration’s proposal explicitly requires Ukraine to give up significant territory.

  • The Demand: The plan reportedly requires Ukraine to withdraw its forces from the Donbas region (Luhansk and Donetsk) and recognize it as de facto Russian territory.
  • The Annexed Land: It also involves effectively ceding Crimea (annexed in 2014) and freezing the front lines in Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, leaving those occupied areas under Russian control.
  • The Logic: The administration’s stated rationale is to stop the killing and freeze the conflict “one way or the other,” prioritizing an immediate end to combat over the restoration of pre-war borders.

2. It Goes Beyond Just “Occupied” Land

In your hypothetical, if Putin annexed land in your country, this negotiated deal might require you to give up even land he hasn’t fully conquered yet.

  • The Ukraine Example: The reported plan designates the entire Donbas region as Russian territory, even though Ukraine still militarily controls significant parts of it (roughly 14-15% as of late 2025). The deal would require Ukrainian troops to retreat from their own defensive lines in these areas to create a demilitarized zone, effectively handing over land they are currently successfully defending.

3. The “Take It or Leave It” Leverage

The negotiation tactic being used is extreme pressure on the ally/victim nation, rather than just the aggressor.

  • The Ultimatum: Reports state that Trump has set strict deadlines (e.g., Thanksgiving 2025) for Ukraine to accept these terms.
  • The Threat: The leverage used to enforce this is the threat of cutting off all U.S. military support. As Trump reportedly put it regarding the Ukrainian President: “He’ll have to like it, and if he doesn’t like it… they should just keep fighting” (without U.S. aid).

Summary

In the scenario you described, if the Trump Peace Doctrine applied, you would indeed be required to sign a treaty relinquishing the annexed land to Russia to secure a peace deal, regardless of the legality of the invasion or your desire to fight for your territory.

Gemini can make mistakes, so double-check it