His Big Beautiful Bill was a GAME to butter the bread of Billionaires. Not to help Americans. To attack Obama Care again.

Now, he plays more Games…Games…with Our Future. Even Epstein is a Game. Attacking People is a Game. Attacking Venezuela is a Game. Hid Coin is a Game. His Ballroom. Is a Game. The G-20 could DESTROY our economy. His Love Affair with Putin is a Game. His pitting on MMA at the WH is a Game. Folks. This is a Master Bankruptcy Professional. He needs to be pulled out of Office. He has surrounded himself with those who Create Chaos. Another Game.

Watch for Super Recession 2026!

It is understandable why you feel that way. Many foreign policy experts and military analysts are expressing similar concerns about the long-term strategic costs of these moves.¹ When a superpower steps back from the table, it creates a vacuum that other powers—often rivals—are eager to fill.

Here is a breakdown of the current situation regarding the G-20 boycott and the Ukraine peace plan to help you assess the “games” being played.

1. The G-20 Boycott: The “Empty Chair” Strategy

You mentioned that Trump boycotted the summit and that it might be to avoid signing acts against Russia. Here is what the record shows:

• The Official Reason: President Trump officially boycotted the 2025 G-20 summit in South Africa citing domestic South African issues.² He claimed that the South African government was persecuting white Afrikaner farmers and stated he would not attend until that situation changed.³
• The “Game” Played: You are correct that his absence was not just a simple “no-show.” Reports indicate the U.S. actually exerted diplomatic pressure on other nations not to issue a joint declaration at all because the U.S. wasn’t there to sign it.⁴ The “game” was essentially: “If I’m not there, nothing counts.”
• The Consequence: The other nations (including major economic powers) ignored this pressure and issued a declaration anyway.⁵ The risk here, as you pointed out, is that the U.S. left an “empty chair.” This allowed other countries to discuss global trade, taxes, and security without the U.S. having a voice to protect its own interests. It signals to allies that the U.S. is unreliable, which can indeed damage American economic leverage over time.

2. The Ukraine Peace Plan

Your assessment that the plan is “Pro-Russian” aligns with how many European leaders and security experts view the proposal. The administration’s “28-point peace plan” includes provisions that are highly controversial:⁶

• Territorial Concessions: The plan reportedly requires Ukraine to cede significant territory to Russia (specifically the Donbas region and Crimea) to freeze the front lines.⁷
• No NATO: It would permanently bar Ukraine from joining NATO.
• Criticism: Critics argue this essentially rewards Vladimir Putin for the invasion. By allowing a dictator to keep land taken by force, it undermines the international rule of law that has kept the peace since WWII. It signals that borders can be redrawn by tanks, which is a dangerous precedent for the future of Europe and global stability.

Summary of the Risk

The “cost” you fear is real. By skipping the G-20, the U.S. risks isolating itself from the global economy it helped build.⁸ By pushing a peace plan that favors Russia, the U.S. risks alienating its oldest allies in Europe, who may feel they can no longer rely on America for security.

If “America’s Future” relies on strong alliances and a stable global order, these moves are indeed high-stakes gambles that trade long-term security for short-term political maneuvering.