Whether it would be better to send UN troops or US troops to Israel is a complex question with no easy answer.

There are several advantages to sending UN troops. First, UN troops are generally seen as more neutral than troops from any individual country. This could help to build trust and reduce tensions between Israel and Hamas. Second, UN troops are typically drawn from a variety of countries, which could help to ensure that the response is balanced and reflects the views of the international community. Third, the UN has a long history of peacekeeping experience, and its troops are trained to operate in complex and challenging environments.

However, there are also some potential disadvantages to sending UN troops to Israel. First, the UN Security Council would need to approve the deployment of troops, and this could be difficult to achieve given the current division on the Council over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Second, the UN could struggle to raise the necessary funds to deploy and sustain a peacekeeping force in Israel. Third, UN peacekeeping missions have been criticized in the past for being ineffective or even harmful.

Ultimately, the decision of whether to send UN troops or US troops to Israel would need to be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the specific circumstances of the conflict and the potential risks and benefits of each option.

In the current situation, it is unclear whether the UN Security Council would be able to agree on a deployment of UN troops to Israel. The United States has also vetoed previous attempts to deploy UN peacekeepers to the Palestinian territories. As a result, it is more likely that the United States would send its own troops to Israel if requested. However, even this is not guaranteed, as the US government would need to weigh the risks and benefits of getting involved in the conflict.