Money? How’d we get to this point? And are we just as possible to bite the bullet again Today as much as they did when the Stock Market Crashed before? Do you trust Today’s Politicians? If not, then your same level of Trust you have in Politicians correlates to the same level of Trust you have in the Government. Does that paint a pretty, Rosie picture or a picture of concern? A picture of Concern most likely. And of you have No Trust in one, then you have No Trust in the other. So, what fits you? Hmm…
The stock market can crash due to a variety of factors, ranging from extreme circumstances such as wars and political uncertainty, to events more closely related to market fundamentals, such as a sudden and widespread sell-off of shares driven by panicking investors. A combination of these different factors can result in a sudden and dramatic downturn in the market.
The coronavirus pandemic is an example of how extreme circumstances can cause a crash in the stock market. As global economies have been severely impacted by the pandemic, investors have become concerned about the future prospects of companies, causing them to sell off shares and eroding already weakened share prices. This has caused a severe drop in stock prices, resulting in a stock market crash.
More traditional market forces can also contribute to a crash. As with the pandemic-related crash, a sudden sell-off of shares is the primary source of an economic downturn. This can occur if investor sentiment falls off due to a succession of bad news, or because of a general fear of economic stability. When investors become pessimistic about the economy, they will sell off their shares, causing prices to drop. This creates a powder-keg effect, with investors increasingly selling off in a panic.
In addition, negative macroeconomic factors, such as a sharp fall in economic growth and confidence in the stock market, can lead to a crash. This is often caused by widespread overleverage among investors, who are affected in a particularly negative way when prices drop. This leads to the snowball effect of investor pessimism and panic-selling, pushing prices rapidly downwards.
Finally, external factors, such as political instability and protectionism, can lead to a drop in investor sentiment, resulting in a stock market crash. This can often be a consequence of a breakdown in global trade relations, with investors concerned about unpredictable political and trade risks.
A stock market crash can have a serious impact on an economy, often leading to a recession. Therefore, it is important for investors to remain aware of the economic and market conditions, and monitor their investments accordingly in order to mitigate any losses.
The Evolution of Payment Methods throughout Global Trade: From Ancient Coins to Paper Money
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the evolution of payment methods throughout global trade over the centuries. It will discuss the various forms of money used in different regions and throughout various ages, and how they developed into the paper money we use today. It will consider the various forms of payment utilized in various parts of the world, including coins, paper money, and electronic payments, and how trade between nations has grown throughout the centuries.
Ancient Coins and Barter
The earliest form of money used in global trade occurred during the Bronze Age (prior to 3000 B.C.), when coins began to be used as a form of currency in numerous regions. The earliest known coins were minted in Lydia (now part of modern-day Turkey) from a combination of gold and silver. Coins were first used in Babylon (present-day Iraq) in 678 BC and soon spread throughout Greece, Egypt, and eventually Rome.
In addition to coins, bartering was another common form of payment in the ancient world. This involved exchanging goods or services directly for other goods or services without the use of money. Bartering was common among the Egyptians, Greeks, and other early civilizations, and pre-dated coinage.
Paper Money
Paper money first appeared in the 7th century and was used primarily in China. This was thousands of years before the invention of paper money in Europe. The earliest known use of paper money was during the Tang Dynasty (A.D. 618–907) when the government began issuing paper money as part of an experiment designed to facilitate trade.
The use of paper money soon spread to other parts of the world, including Europe. The first paper money in Europe appeared during the 13th century in Sweden, and further spread to other nations throughout the 16th and 17th centuries.
Global Trade
Global trade has been around for centuries, and has grown over time, as more and more nations have developed trade relationships. The Silk Road, a series of trading routes stretching from China to the Mediterranean Sea, was one of the earliest examples of global trade. By the 16th century, global trade had expanded to include goods and services from all over the world, including the Americas, Africa, and Asia.
This paper has discussed the evolution of payment methods throughout global trade over the centuries. It discussed the various forms of money used in different regions throughout various ages, and how they developed into the paper money we use today. It also discussed how global trade has grown steadily over the centuries, and how the use of coins, paper money, and other forms of payment have facilitated the growth of global trade. As the world continues to become more interconnected, the ability to exchange goods and services between nations will become increasingly important and payment methods will continue to evolve accordingly.
But where does the Banking System stand Today vs the Great Depression?
The banking collapse during the Great Depression was one of the most catastrophic events in United States history. Many people lost their savings and entire livelihoods. While the causes of the collapse were complex, the impact it had on the country cannot be overstated. In this paper, I will discuss the causes of the banking collapse during the Great Depression, as well as how modern laws have made a similar collapse unlikely today. I will then discuss the recent collapse of Specialty Underwriting Ventures (SVB), a financial services firm, and how President Trump’s deregulation of certain banking laws led to its failure.
Background
The Great Depression lasted from 1929 to 1939. It was a period of major economic downturn that had catastrophic consequences for the country. At its peak, unemployment rose to 25%, wages declined dramatically, and there was a widespread collapse of businesses. The banking collapse was a key factor in the Great Depression; it resulted in the closure of almost 8,000 banks, representing 2006 of all banks in operation at the time (Friedman and Schwartz).
Cause of Banking Collapse
The banking collapse of the Great Depression was caused by a mix of factors. One of the primary causes was the stock market crash of 1929. The stock market crash crippled the banking system by reducing available capital and confidence in the economy (Friedman and Schwartz). On top of this, banks were also affected by the Agricultural Depression, which resulted in pervasive bank closures around the country. Additionally, credit facilities were limited due to the passing of the Glass-Steagall Act, which limited the amount of speculative lending banks were allowed to do (Friedman and Schwartz).
The banking collapse was further exacerbated by government policy during the period, which was largely inefficient or outdated. One example of this was the practice of gold hoarding, which required banks to have a minimum amount of gold reserves in order to keep liquidity in the system. This practice significantly limited the amount of money in circulation, resulting in a decrease in spending power and, in turn, leading to bank failures (Friedman and Schwartz).
The Stock Market Crash of 1929 was a major event that marked the onset of the Great Depression as well as one of the most defining economic events in history. The crash was the result of a number of underlying factors, including a large build-up of speculation in the stock market, an unequal distribution of wealth, the declining purchasing power of the dollar, and an unregulated stock market.
The initial crash began on October 24, 1929. The DJIA dropped by 11 percent in one day, and the stock market went into a nose dive, with a total loss of nearly 12 percent in two days. This crash would come to be known as Black Thursday and initiated the severe economic depression of the 1930s.
The immediate cause of the crash was a result of rampant speculation in the stock market that had built up over the prior five years. From 1924 to 1929, the stock market had gone from an all-time low of 63 points to an all-time high of 381 points, an increase of over 500 percent. Many investors, large and small, believed that the stock market was going to continue its rise and invested heavily in stock, both on borrowed money and with money saved from their wages.
The American economy of the 1920s was characterized by inequality in wealth distribution. The top 1 percent of the population held 40 percent of the total national wealth, while the bottom 60 percent held only a tenth. In addition, the Industrial Revolution had created both overcrowded cities and the factory system, and this had caused the economic polarization between the wealthy and the poor.
The dangers of inequality in wealth distribution today are similar to those experienced in the 1920s. The two primary dangers of wealth inequality are economic instability and societal unrest.
On the economic side, the risk of economic inequality is that the rise of the wealthy will lead to the widening of the divide between rich and poor. This causes a higher concentration of wealth within a smaller group of people, which can lead to economic volatility as the cost of living increases with the disappearance of middle class purchasing power. In addition, the imbalance of wealth can lead to corporate monopolization, which limits competition and reduces economic growth.
On the societal side, increased wealth inequality can lead to increased divisions between classes and tensions between the wealthy and the poor. This can lead to a decrease in trust between members of different socio-economic groups, which can stifle economic growth and opportunities for social mobility. In addition, it can lead to a decrease in civic engagement and a lack of political representation for those who are economically disadvantaged.
In short, the dangers of inequality in wealth distribution are far-reaching, both economically and socially. Imbalances of wealth can lead to volatility and unrest within both economies and societies. It is important, therefore, to ensure that there is equitable wealth distribution to ensure a stronger and more stable environment for all.
The purchasing power of the dollar had also been slowly eroding since World War I and had reached its lowest level since the Civil War by 1929. This meant that one dollar could buy less and less of goods and services, which had an influence on the stock market prices.
Although the stock market crash of 1929 is usually attributed to speculation, it was more likely a result of a combination of several factors, including inequality in wealth distribution, the declining purchasing power of the dollar and an unregulated stock market. These, in turn, led to a speculative bubble that eventually burst and caused the market to crash. The economic effects of the crash are still felt today and serve as a reminder of the fragility of the modern economy.
Modern Banking Laws
While the banking laws and policy at the time of the Great Depression were grossly inadequate, modern banking laws have made a collapse of similar magnitude much less likely. One such example is the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The FDIC was created as part of the Banking Reform Act of 1933, which was passed in the wake of the Great Depression. This organization provides insurance to deposit accounts in banks, up to a certain amount, ensuring that customers’ savings are safe in the event of a bank failure (FDIC).
The advent of the FDIC and other modern banking laws has largely eliminated the risks of predation and mismanagement that were so pervasive prior to the Great Depression. Banks are now required to hold capital reserves as insurance against losses, thus reducing the risk of failure due to bad investment decisions. Additionally, banks must also submit to routine regulation to guard against fraudulent activities. Finally, government policy now focuses on keeping inflation in check, which helps to limit the chance of widespread economic collapse (Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco).
The SVB Collapse
Despite the presence of modern banking laws, some banking failures still occur. The most recent example of this was the collapse of Specialty Underwriting Ventures (SVB), a financial services firm in the United States. The company was founded in 2012 and specialized in high-risk debt.
During the Trump administration, several of the banking regulations put in place after the Great Depression were rolled back. Furthermore, the administration began to make it easier for large financial institutions to access leverage, increasing the amount of risk they were exposed to (Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco).
The deregulation of the banking industry resulted in heavy losses for SVB. As a result of the lax regulation, they took on too much risk and began to incur heavy losses. After several years of this, the company was forced to declare bankruptcy in 2019 (Hess).
Conclusion
In conclusion, the banking collapse of the Great Depression was caused by a mix of economic, political and financial factors. While modern banking laws have made a similar collapse today much less likely, the recent collapse of Specialty Underwriting Ventures shows that risk remains. It is therefore important for the government to ensure that banking regulations are stringent enough to prevent such a disastrous event from occurring again.
The Banking Collapse during the Great Depression and Its Causes
The banking collapse during the Great Depression was one of the most devastating economic crises in history. The entire banking system nearly collapsed in 1933. The collapse had far-reaching consequences that influenced the nation for decades. The collapse of the banking system was caused by many factors, including structural flaws in the banking system, stock market speculation and the contagion effects of instability, and the lack of federal regulations. Understanding what occurred during the Great Depression will help elucidate why it is not likely to happen again due to the laws and regulations that govern the banking system today.
Structural Flaws in the Banking System
Structural flaws were one of the major causes of the banking collapse during the Great Depression. The banking system in the United States prior to the Great Depression was characterized by an outdated legal framework that allowed for a large number of relatively small, heavily-leveraged banks. This vulnerable structure allowed for the rapid spread of instability from one bank to another, an event known as contagion. Furthermore, the banking system was highly concentrated in certain regions and not spread out across the country. This resulted in regional banking panics when instability occurred in one region of the country, as other banks in the area rapidly withdrew deposits and transferred them to other states in an attempt to maintain their liquidity.
Stock Market Speculation and the Contagion Effects of Instability
Stock market speculation was another major cause of the banking collapse during the Great Depression. In the late 1920s, stocks had become incredibly popular and investors rushed to purchase them, resulting in an unsustainable stock market bubble. Speculators splurged on stocks using borrowed money and margin accounts, driving up prices and creating instability. When the stock market crashed in October 1929, those same leveraged speculators were quickly wiped out and banks were unable to cover their margin debts. This caused a massive outflow of deposits from the banking system, leading to a liquidity crisis from which many banks were unable to recover. As the number of failed banks soared, the contagion effects of instability caused a complete collapse of the entire banking system.
Lack of Federal Regulations
The lack of federal regulations was another major cause of the banking collapse during the Great Depression. Prior to the Great Depression, the banking system was mainly regulated at the state level, with no central banking authority overseeing the entire system. This allowed for a large number of weak banks to exist and created an overly fragile system that was vulnerable to collapse. Furthermore, the states lacked the resources to properly regulate and supervise the banks, leading to rampant fraud and instability. This contributed to the banking system’s vulnerability to the stock market crash and the resultant liquidity crisis.
Conclusion
The banking collapse during the Great Depression was one of the most devastating financial crises in history. The collapse was caused by many factors, including structural flaws in the banking system, stock market speculation and contagion effects of instability, and the lack of federal regulations. The laws and regulations that govern the banking system today are much stricter and robust than those that were in place during the Great Depression. This has resulted in a much safer and more resilient banking system. However, it is important to note that during the Trump Administration there were laws that were removed allowing companies such as SVB Financial Group to fail. Removing or weakening banking regulations can create its own set of risks to the banking system, and it is important for governments to ensure that banking regulations remain as strict as possible in order to prevent future financial crises.
But could it happen again? Damn Skippy it can…the Stock Market is vulnerable…
President Donald Trump signed the biggest rollback of bank regulations since the global financial crisis into law Thursday. May 2018.
Opponents, however, have argued the changes could open taxpayers to more liability if the financial system collapses or increase the chances of discrimination in mortgage lending.
thelivingbreathingjamesbrown.com 
You must be logged in to post a comment.